If gravity was strong, it would be hard to stand up .aren't we lucky
2025-06-22 06:07
🔍 Link0u Search Engine
과학/테크/IT트렌드
23 Minutes of Universe Facts by Professor Brian Cox
- Tech Topia 오래 전 2025.06.19 06:15 인기
-
36,441
39
Get ready to have your mind blown for the next 23 minutes by Professor Brian Cox! From there, strap in for a wild journey through ...
- 이전글A great way to stay safe#science #technology #shorts #viralvideo2025.06.23
- 다음글This Snake-Like Robot 3D Prints Its Own Body?#shorts#robotics2025.06.18
댓글목록
Food for thoughts: A small fish in the middle of the Atlantic ocean thinks the ocean is infinite doesn't it? Question 1: The objects that are said to be moving away from each other at a speed much higher than the speed of light(Einstein: How dare you say that?! Sir the objects aren't moving faster than light, the space holding the objects is stretching itself that fast. One explanation could be that they are headed toward a super black hole?) when we look at them, we see them as they were in the past not as they are now. Many of them we see images of, probably have died long ago haven't they? So what we see every night out there is like you looking at my handsome picture from 45 years ago, no? Question 2: My job is to provide theories and you-guys-in-the-know's job is to prove them right or wrong: The Universe is finite and it is like a Gargantuann Galaxy with an imperfectly rounded shape. It does have a center in which the largest black hole is forming and one day it will swallow the entire Universe, which will be contracting at the same speed it is expanding, and turn it into that little hot dense small thingy that caused the last Big Bang. Then it will collapse on its own weight starting another Big Bang, no?
2025-06-22 05:04
https://youtube.com/shorts/vo2WDsdhqLM?si=d7eQBZrdBx1HweDk
2025-06-21 20:44
Small, dense and hot beyond imagination and when there was no time at all or a place, it decided to explode! ? ? Well we don't know much about the point of singularity. The physic laws break down at that point. It doesn't matter what was before the Big Bang... Yeah let us continue explain it away, why don't we? All of this to me is a sign of some sort of giving up, some sort of laziness, some sort of putting break on our creative thinking. Part of me says that's understandable and the other part tells me shut up. Stop accepting this silly nonsense. In my layman view the key to crack the rest of the mystery lies in expanding our curiosity into finding more about the origin of that bloody tiny thing that exploded. Otherwise the rest of the explanation of the Big Bang theory, from t=~ 10 to the power of -43s just differs in details from Jesus' "let there be light" and the "Universe was built in 7 days thereafter.." Have you ever paid attention to a new year eve's firework in, say, London? Explodes, spreads through the space and dies out (or if you want me to play Einstein: it changes its form or turns into something else). No matter how huge the Universe is, the total energy produced by the Big Bang must have been limited. So far we have not observed anything unlimited in the Universe. The Earth has a limited size and so does the solar system and our Galaxy and other Galaxies we've seen. If Big Bang had unlimited / infinite energy the explosion should have continued infinitely too, shouldn't it? Well if you guys in the know can blame it on "singularity", then a laymen like me can't be blamed for his comments. Anyway it is still my favorite explanation about the Universe and certainly kills all of the creation theories for me. By the way you rock Brian.
2025-06-21 14:26
Facts or disinformation?
2025-06-21 09:11
When I need to escape the humdrum bullshit of the current selfish world WE exist in. I just love to listen to Prof Brian Cox . I'm 69 and even at that age I learn and totally enjoy His Simple and Informed Narrative. I Hope there are people like Me who just enjoy and think about everything He explains so Simply. A modern day HONEST Scientist and Hero ??????????
2025-06-21 07:21
Brian’s hair is definitely a wig. Can’t understand what he’s on about he must get all his information beamed down from URANUS.
2025-06-21 06:07
? Globtard buĺlsit
2025-06-21 02:57
You say that 12hzzaarr afraad halak while it was only 1200 ! Is BBC paid by Mossad !!! Your hypocrisy has been exposed by your coverage of Gaza Genocide
2025-06-21 01:22
So weak yet blackholes exist
2025-06-20 18:18
higgs ❤ Q
2025-06-20 16:48
Brian, i'm sure you are the Genius, at this point i feel Like a Idiot with ?
2025-06-20 16:29
Dark matter matters?
2025-06-20 14:54
Because we're here. Get on with it
2025-06-20 11:37
Get gravity together and it shines like a Star
2025-06-20 11:22
23 minutes of Brian Cox talking science. Yes please and thank you.
2025-06-20 10:37
Sounds like Gravity is an emergent force.
2025-06-20 05:17
Very well spoken and understanding him..❤❤❤
2025-06-20 02:20
Im a lay person but still find all of this fascinating. I keep hearing how weak gravity is, but doesn't gravity keep our solar system together, not to mention galaxies? Doesn't seem weak to me.
2025-06-20 01:36
Where are all the other comments?
Actually, comments aside, I find these videos to be very disjunct. They seem to be small, random bits excerpted from larger lectures or interviews. But there us no basic outline or topic! Just disconnected sentences from some astronomy text, like constantly switching channels on a television with science programs. Strange and not useful. It's a glorified ramble.
2025-06-19 22:27
Born with IQ. Can't learn it.
40 yrs of school can't fix stupid.
Infinite electric universe!!!!!
2025-06-19 21:40
Brian Cox is a PhD with low IQ.
Spreading fiction not fact.
2025-06-19 21:38
Is this video agentic work
2025-06-19 15:27
I ❤ this man's smile (as well as his accent)
It's not a smile of an idiot but a smile of genius who is excited to tell you about what he spent years and years of learning ❤
2025-06-19 15:08
wtf was this ending its obvious brian was in the middle of talking and you cut it. shame on you for gatekeeping knowledge Tech Topia.
2025-06-19 14:44
I heard you prefer cox… to Brian?
2025-06-19 12:32
"We're not trying to be right..." this is why I put weight in science.
2025-06-19 09:01
the best scientist last 15 years old ever
2025-06-19 07:49
If I learn 1% of what Brian understands, I'd be a genius. Can't even imagine being on his level!
2025-06-19 07:26
Redshift is the reduction in the energy of light due to the great distance, and the positions of stars seen are also not correct because light refraction is also present. The main question in physics at the moment is the development of the speed of light.
2025-06-19 07:11
❤
2025-06-19 06:21
OSIRIS -TUTANKHAMUN UNIVERSES COLLAPSE BEFORE THE BIG BANG THEORY
HUE-MAN AND MAN-KIND
Human are HORUS
Mankind are neanderthal
Human are hue
Mankind are apes
Human are black people
Mankind are white Arab india Chinese and other
Planet of the apes
See no evil
Speak no evil
Hear no evil
INFACT
James 4:7
God is Zeus Dionysus Dios goat devil ?
From Greek acropolis
Revelation 22:16
Jesus Christ is EROS Lucifer morningstar
From POMPEII Roman
Quran 14:22
Quran Muhammad ibn Abdullah mecca necronomicon is Satan iblis
PLANET X NIBIRU OR OSIRIS-TUTANKHAMUN RISE UP AGAIN!!
2025-06-23 20:15
The question "Why am I here?" has been asked since the dawn of thinking, under the reign of the most rigid religions with hardly any more basic physics than 'most things are falling' and has nothing to do with logic. Since Newton we definetly know that nature is mathematically exploitable, so science got more and more funding and became prestigious. That earth is not the center may be true, regarding that the mathematics got easier, but take any point in the universe and You still can describe any celestial motion correctly. What a luck, that the hubble telescope was able to show us more than white spots on black background. If that would have been the case, the interest for it would have died with the realisation that we'll never will travel than the speed of light. And cosmology wouldn't be an argument for the next even bigger telescopes, and nobel prises would be given for some practical achievements.
2025-06-23 20:06
yep Look At Space Nut The Planet So on/
Star Trek ..) /Star Gate ..Great ..Sounds
Daft But A Lot of it Pop's ..x
2025-06-23 08:27
"Wow" - J. Rogan Now I know why they call it "dope"
2025-06-23 05:13
You have absolutely no proof that anything you say isn't just an educated guess! No one knows what the real truth is and it's impossible to know if you are right or totally wrong!
2025-06-22 23:37
Everything he tells you will be wrong next week. Waste of time.
2025-06-22 21:32
Thank you for such sens of understanding univers as we are flying in a portion of the closest univers that is our home we are supposed to meet Andromeda in a few billions years the question his would are our sun will be steal living wen this will coure? I thing that this is a safe connection to a survival of our intelligence bad or good but the obvious and brobably unique chance that we will get in the near univers life only 4 billions years!!!!
2025-06-24 08:34
The universe is doubling in size because it is being developed and not a full being yet, we are just cells on a node in it's brain trying to explain what it is.
2025-06-24 07:23
higgs can be acient transmiters and microdrones, for dark matter I have a theory too but too early
2025-06-25 11:26
So gravity is inertia, interesting view ? ?
2025-06-26 09:07
Once your credibility is gone, it is gone forever
2025-06-26 04:32
Cash-For-Climate Change-Comments-COX
2025-06-26 04:31
I love listening to scientific minds discussing current theories about the universe. But I especially appreciate that underlying everything said is the idea that we simply just do not know yet about so many things, and likely never will in some cases. This is so much more satisfying than the fairytales many of us are taught from our religious texts.
2025-06-27 13:51
By modern standards Einstein wasn’t really that smart at all. In fact, string theory has disproved most everything Einstein ever said
2025-06-27 03:02
And why is dark energy , named dark not light energy? Seeing as it seems to make up everything but not describe? It’s a bit like a new religion
2025-06-28 06:31
Then what and why ?
2025-06-28 06:29
But why are we ? And what if we find them ?
2025-06-28 06:29
Brian is an amazing individual. I enjoy hearing the things he tells us. Mind blowing facts and knowledge.
2025-06-29 22:36
Why did you need to put this stupid music??
2025-07-01 16:09
If you're reading this right now, I just want to say; I'm rooting for you. We’re strangers, but that doesn’t mean I don’t care. I know what it’s like to feel like you're pushing a boulder uphill. I felt that way until I picked up Manifest and Receive by Eva Hartley. I can’t explain it perfectly, but it changed my whole perspective. Since then, things have been flowing—money, peace, confidence. Maybe this is your moment too. Stay open. Wishing you more than you ever imagined. ??
2025-07-01 04:17
3 months ago I was broke, anxious, and completely lost. My friend sent me Manifest and Receive by Eva Hartley and I read it in one sitting. Not even kidding, my whole energy shifted. I stopped chasing and started receiving. New clients, better sleep, confidence back. people don’t sleep on this. ?✨
2025-07-01 03:45
A few weeks ago, I was chatting with a friend about how manifesting never seemed to work for me. I’d tried so many methods but still felt stuck. We heard about a book called Manifest and Receive by Eva Hartley on a podcast, and I was hesitant at first. But after reading just a few chapters, I realized how much I was missing. Eva's approach is so different from anything I’ve ever tried. It’s not just about thinking positive, it’s about aligning with real-world actions that bring your desires into reality. Now, I’ve manifested opportunities I never imagined possible, and my mindset has shifted completely. If you’re frustrated like I was, don’t hesitate. Read this book. It will change everything ❤
2025-07-01 03:37
Honestly, it breaks my heart how Manifest and Receive by Eva Hartley isn’t getting the attention it deserves. This book changed me. People need to wake up to this.
2025-07-01 03:23
Everyone who reads this, we don’t know each other and probably never will, but I wish you all the best in life and all the luck in the world. If you’re struggling right now, trust me—I know exactly how that feels. I spent years working hard but never really getting ahead. I thought success was all about effort, but I was missing something bigger. That changed the moment I read Manifest and Receive by Eva Hartley. I don’t know how to explain it, but my income doubled in just a few months, and for the first time, I feel like I truly understand how wealth works. If you’re reading this, maybe you were meant to. Wishing you all abundance and success. ?✨
2025-07-01 02:52
Gravity is the sum of the Coulomb forces between two uncharged objects.
In other words, the particles that generate gravity are electrons and protons.
Think of a neutron as a pair of an electron and a proton.
Let's consider the Sun and the Earth.
The electrons in the sun and the electrons in the earth repel each other.
The electrons in the sun and the protons in the earth attract each other.
The protons in the sun and the electrons in the earth attract each other.
The protons in the Sun and the protons in the Earth repel each other.
Sum of the above four forces between the Sun and the Earth is the gravitational force between the Sun and the Earth.
The forces of attraction and repulsion between objects are almost the same, but the force of attraction is slightly stronger.
The reason is that the Coulomb forces of attraction and repulsion are not the same.
You may wonder why I say that.
Actually, a Scottish physicist called John Robison has made such measurements.
According to John Robison's measurements, the force of attraction is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, while the force of repulsion is inversely proportional to the 2.06 power of the distance.
In other words, the result was that the attractive force was stronger than the repulsive force.
If this is certain, it would seem natural that gravity would only generate an attractive force.
However, the above measurement is quite old, so there is a problem with its accuracy.
The question is whether repulsion really does not obey the inverse square law, or whether John Robison was mistaken and in fact it does obey the inverse square law but the repulsion is simply weaker than the attraction.
If it does not obey the inverse square law, then the physics needs to be reworked.
If it is simply that the repulsion is weaker, then we can simply multiply the Coulomb constant for the repulsion by a value slightly smaller than the Coulomb constant for the attraction.
2025-07-02 11:24
Do any “new” stars occasionally occur in the visible universe? (Light from an ancient star just reaching us now.) Or is space expanding too fast? Has anyone ever observed the moment that light reaches us? I’m assuming it would look like turning on a flashlight? Just suddenly “turns on”?
2025-07-01 23:44