🔍 Link0u Search Engine

새글

    최근 30일 이내 등록된 새글 이에요.
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgyItgi9mdWsaE6V3JJ4AaABAg] “It is likely that the apparent incompatibility of quantum theory and relativity is not an incompatibility in the theories themselves, but in our way of thinking about them.”--John Bell
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgxYipjlqlul65YIiu14AaABAg] “The theory yields much, but it hardly brings us closer to the secret of the Old One.”--Albert Einstein
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgweNaQPuO6bRrYnTGB4AaABAg] If there's a line separating causality then the causal goes with causal and vice versa. Think of sand being struck by lightning, the glass that forms is more causally connected that the sand that remains.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:Ugy_mvkbfB1ynfFsNsF4AaABAg] “There is no problem with the compatibility between quantum mechanics and relativity... the real problem is interpretation.”--Steven Weinberg
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgxCb3wmpm2fLCHWXI14AaABAg] Hey Curt, there's a Professor from the Federal University of Bahia (in Brazil) who is a physicist and philosopher as well and has some work like that too. For instance, he and a student have shown that Special Relativity actually possesses 14 postulates. He also analyzed extensively the Michelson and Morley experiment, showing that there were several (happy) mathematical mistakes in their and Lorentz subsequent analysis of the experiment (that fortunately were right for Special Relativity). His name is Ricardo Miranda. Unfortunately he didn't produce much for some time, because he became director of the institute of Physics there for a while, and had a ton of administrative work, but nevertheless, you might like to have a conversation with him. He is a very rigorous thinker, and his classes were really profound because of that. Here is a contact link, if you ever want to try contacting him: https://www.fis.ufba.br/pt-br/ricardo-carneiro-de-miranda-filho If you ever do that, please tell him that his former student, Lucas Pereira, sent him a hug!
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgxOy5_NIF5wDbzdJaN4AaABAg] Or you jump all over to try and make it work. If the theory is correct, then it should be in there. Good talk, Curt. To the guest as well. Thanks. Peace ✌️ ?.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgwjvIIxYGSNg8kVHB54AaABAg] I often wonder how long it will be before physics gets over it's postmodernist infection. It's like a drinking game waiting for him to say "you just told me how you plan to use a word".
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:Ugw92My138XlCo3sjct4AaABAg] I'm hearing Maxwell's demon in this example.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:Ugx-FFZdFVa8KVfeCyd4AaABAg] People are often completely blind to the meaning of the words they use. They have a dreamlike thought that consumes their full mental capacity. The thought, with years of HABITUAL THINKING, is 'locked in'. That is why the old write down the new thoughts and then the fresh, clear young minds pick up the new and extend it. Your words just made me think about my difficulty explaining to people who have great confusion about grid electricity. There are several confused ideas at once. '1984 double think', 2 ideas that contradic each other but are both believed as true in the one mind. Nuclear fueled electricity to replace national fossil fueled energy. But grid electricity is only 10% generation plant $ infrastructure and 90% grid $ infrastructure. And grid electricity is only 5% of national fossil fueled energy. So, generation plant $billions ×10×20 if nuclear is the practical solution. ?.?.? Rooftop PV is dirt-cheap electricity because it is dispersed generation and grid free.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgzZbjROkVEVxg4IOaN4AaABAg] Sounds like the indeterminism of Newtonian physics is nonphysical. If so, why does it matter?
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgyGzct8vMqiWaQhQfl4AaABAg] The bag-of-marbles argument assumes that gravity affects marbles that are close together in the same way as marbles that are far apart. Which is fine as a hypothesis, but it still has to be checked by experiment. So yes, a thought experiment is just a form of argument, a way of exploring the consequences of a theory.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:Ugw6M3FcikYOZBBn7p14AaABAg] For small move in the foundation of physics see you tube video: Electric Charge Physical Definition: https://youtu.be/-7DmAwm3NkY?si=gbFLM7Ej3Fporcx2.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgxPL7YQ0QMhlneqa_N4AaABAg] So, Landauer's principle is often being used to set up scenarios that kind of infer "immaculate conception", the calculated values seem to ignore the "ripples" created by practical implementation?
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:Ugx03mnUiuXqRxSgQ9p4AaABAg] In regard to your advertising, I would argue the flow of money tells us something about how the univerce works.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드
  • The 300-Year-Old Physics Mistake No One Noticed [댓글]
    [ytcid:UgzZqMKCnLb7s7segcJ4AaABAg] The Landau module for cities , pretty women/ ugly women is very useful. NYC has the highest module in the USA.
    2025-06-27　과학/테크/IT트렌드